Charging System, Wiring, Lighting
-
LOUD MOUSE
- honda305.com Member
- Posts: 7817
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 8:23 am
- Location: KERRVILLE, TEXAS
Post
by LOUD MOUSE » Fri Jun 23, 2017 6:41 pm
All rotors are marked.
The original CB will show CB72 which is the higher mag. .............lm
sarals wrote:LM, that makes sense. So, an unmarked rotor, then?
-
sarals
- honda305.com Member
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:19 pm
- Location: Monterey Peninsula, California
Post
by sarals » Fri Jun 23, 2017 7:10 pm
Billiam wrote:Yehbut, sorry to labour the point but for the benefit of others - Are you using all three phases of the alternator. If not you are going nowhere.
No worries, you're not laboring the point! But, yes, all three phases are in use when the light switch is on.
1965 CB77 305 Super Hawk
1989 NT650 Hawk GT
1981 Yamaha XJ550 Seca
-
sarals
- honda305.com Member
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:19 pm
- Location: Monterey Peninsula, California
Post
by sarals » Fri Jun 23, 2017 7:12 pm
LOUD MOUSE wrote:All rotors are marked.
The original CB will show CB72 which is the higher mag. .............lm
sarals wrote:LM, that makes sense. So, an unmarked rotor, then?
Okay. I haven't seen one of those, other than one marked "C72" on eBay right now. I wish I had the original rotor. It was seriously messed up from the starter clutch coming apart, but I'd like to know what exactly it was.
1965 CB77 305 Super Hawk
1989 NT650 Hawk GT
1981 Yamaha XJ550 Seca
-
LOUD MOUSE
- honda305.com Member
- Posts: 7817
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 8:23 am
- Location: KERRVILLE, TEXAS
Post
by LOUD MOUSE » Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:11 am
Good morning Sara.
The C72 you have is for the DREAM engine as it doesn't show the timing marks for the left side. (not needed)
I do have the CB72 issue rotor if you would like one.
I've many a mile with the CL72 bikes I had in the early 60's then the 1963 CB77 I rode for many years and never a voltage problem as to riding with any as I rode the early bikes all the time and with the CB77 I kept the battery at 12 volts at all times so I could ride.
I didn't change anything with the charge system.
Your original rotor was a CB72 (L) issue. ..............lm
sarals wrote:LOUD MOUSE wrote:All rotors are marked.
The original CB will show CB72 which is the higher mag. .............lm
sarals wrote:LM, that makes sense. So, an unmarked rotor, then?
Okay. I haven't seen one of those, other than one marked "C72" on eBay right now. I wish I had the original rotor. It was seriously messed up from the starter clutch coming apart, but I'd like to know what exactly it was.
-
mike in idaho
- honda305.com Member
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:18 pm
- Location: orofino, idaho
Post
by mike in idaho » Sat Jun 24, 2017 3:42 pm
sarals wrote:Billiam wrote:Yehbut, sorry to labour the point but for the benefit of others - Are you using all three phases of the alternator. If not you are going nowhere.
No worries, you're not laboring the point! But, yes, all three phases are in use when the light switch is on.
Actually, it's still a single phase setup. More coils are brought into the circuit when the light switch is on, hence the higher output, but electrically it's still a single phase system.
'65 YG1
'65 CB160
'66 CL160
'66 CL77
'78 XS650
'79 GL1000
'69 T100R
'68 TR6
'69 T120
'72 750 Commando
my company car is a Kenworth
-
sarals
- honda305.com Member
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:19 pm
- Location: Monterey Peninsula, California
Post
by sarals » Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:40 pm
The Old Girl in her original guise way back when never had an issue, either. And I was a college girl riding the dickens out of her and not paying a lot of attention to maintenance. (There was the time I came from class to ride her home and someone had left a note on the saddle that said "LUBE YOUR CHAIN"...) She always started and the lights always worked and the battery never gave me trouble.
LM, I'll let you know on the rotor. It's good to know you have one! And I thank you.
@mikeinidaho, thanks! I stand corrected. :)
LOUD MOUSE wrote:Good morning Sara.
The C72 you have is for the DREAM engine as it doesn't show the timing marks for the left side. (not needed)
I do have the CB72 issue rotor if you would like one.
I've many a mile with the CL72 bikes I had in the early 60's then the 1963 CB77 I rode for many years and never a voltage problem as to riding with any as I rode the early bikes all the time and with the CB77 I kept the battery at 12 volts at all times so I could ride.
I didn't change anything with the charge system.
Your original rotor was a CB72 (L) issue. ..............lm
sarals wrote:LOUD MOUSE wrote:All rotors are marked.
The original CB will show CB72 which is the higher mag. .............lm
sarals wrote:LM, that makes sense. So, an unmarked rotor, then?
Okay. I haven't seen one of those, other than one marked "C72" on eBay right now. I wish I had the original rotor. It was seriously messed up from the starter clutch coming apart, but I'd like to know what exactly it was.
1965 CB77 305 Super Hawk
1989 NT650 Hawk GT
1981 Yamaha XJ550 Seca
-
LOUD MOUSE
- honda305.com Member
- Posts: 7817
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 8:23 am
- Location: KERRVILLE, TEXAS
Post
by LOUD MOUSE » Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:53 pm
That one on eBay is a GOOD DEAL!. .................lm
sarals wrote:The Old Girl in her original guise way back when never had an issue, either. And I was a college girl riding the dickens out of her and not paying a lot of attention to maintenance. (There was the time I came from class to ride her home and someone had left a note on the saddle that said "LUBE YOUR CHAIN"...) She always started and the lights always worked and the battery never gave me trouble.
LM, I'll let you know on the rotor. It's good to know you have one! And I thank you.
@mikeinidaho, thanks! I stand corrected. :)
LOUD MOUSE wrote:Good morning Sara.
The C72 you have is for the DREAM engine as it doesn't show the timing marks for the left side. (not needed)
I do have the CB72 issue rotor if you would like one.
I've many a mile with the CL72 bikes I had in the early 60's then the 1963 CB77 I rode for many years and never a voltage problem as to riding with any as I rode the early bikes all the time and with the CB77 I kept the battery at 12 volts at all times so I could ride.
I didn't change anything with the charge system.
Your original rotor was a CB72 (L) issue. ..............lm
sarals wrote:LOUD MOUSE wrote:All rotors are marked.
The original CB will show CB72 which is the higher mag. .............lm
sarals wrote:LM, that makes sense. So, an unmarked rotor, then?
Okay. I haven't seen one of those, other than one marked "C72" on eBay right now. I wish I had the original rotor. It was seriously messed up from the starter clutch coming apart, but I'd like to know what exactly it was.
|