honda305 Home honda305 Auctions honda305 Gallery honda305 Forum


honda305.com Forum

Login
□ Search
□ FAQ 
□ 
Vintage Honda Owners,
Restorers, Riders and
Admirers

CB 900

Who said it was only about Motorcycles? What else do you collect, restore, enjoy... ?
RonF305
honda305.com Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:52 pm
Location: Southern New Mexico

CB 900

Post by RonF305 » Tue Sep 29, 2009 11:35 am

do any of you forum members have a CB 900? I'm considering buying one to go along with my CL 77 and would like some input from other owners.

e3steve
h305 Moderator
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 1:38 pm
Location: Mallorca, Spain & Warsash, UK

Post by e3steve » Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:08 pm

Hi Ron

I had it's little brother in '79 -- a CB750KZ -- which handled well and ripped it up, for a heavyweight. It was just a bit uncomfortable for my little 29" inside leg; it gave me arse-ache!

Steve

cbxmountainman
honda305.com Member
Posts: 270
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 10:20 am
Location: Green Mountain,NC

CB900

Post by cbxmountainman » Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:04 am

If it's the "F" model, then it's quick for its size and handles ala' typical Hondas of that year. ie: Put some decent rear shocks on it and change the fork oil from "fish" oil to something like BelRay etc. Should do OK for a street bike. JMHO

Vince Lupo
honda305.com Member
Posts: 1371
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:17 am

Post by Vince Lupo » Sat Oct 03, 2009 7:12 pm

Image

This is the 1981 CB900f that I had a while back. Now, this one was heavily modified as you can see, but I might be able to provide a few thoughts on the 900, assuming it's an 'F' we're talking about.

It's a top-heavy bike, and the seat is tall, so hopefully you're at least 5'10" (BTW, the seat depicted on my bike is a Corbin 'Gunfighter and the Lady' seat - the stock seat does not have that dishing for the driver). I think it weighs 587 lbs wet, so it's a bit hefty. It has very good power, and is very comfortable for the long haul. Of course, like many Hondas of the era, the charging system is marginal - don't even think about adding even one extra light!

One of the nice things about the bike (at least during the '80s) was that there was a bunch of aftermarket stuff available for it. Don't know whether you want to stay stock or not, but you can do a lot of interesting things with the bike to make it your own. Personally I think the 750F was a better bike, but I don't think you can go wrong with it. I would definitely consider adding engine guards - it will save your alternator if you happen to drop the bike on that side....ask me how I know!

If I think of anything else that might be helpful, I'll let you know.....thanks for letting me weigh in on the matter.
Last edited by Vince Lupo on Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

cbxmountainman
honda305.com Member
Posts: 270
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 10:20 am
Location: Green Mountain,NC

CB900

Post by cbxmountainman » Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:40 pm

Vince, nice Canadian CB1100F gold wheels. I used to run them on my 1981 CBX sporterized. Took off the fairing/bags and ran a GS1100E 8" headlight. Bike looks cool with the "chair" How'd it run with it?

Vince Lupo
honda305.com Member
Posts: 1371
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:17 am

Re: CB900

Post by Vince Lupo » Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:02 pm

cbxmountainman wrote:Vince, nice Canadian CB1100F gold wheels. I used to run them on my 1981 CBX sporterized. Took off the fairing/bags and ran a GS1100E 8" headlight. Bike looks cool with the "chair" How'd it run with it?
Those gold Comstars are (IMO) the prettiest stock wheels ever to adorn a motorbike. Of course, my being from Toronto helped me secure them way back in the day.

The Velorex 562 is a great sidecar, for anyone who's thinking of getting one, BTW. It took a bit of getting used to at first - you steer more than you lean, though leaning is still part of it (but it's reverse of what you'd think). Of course, right-handers are always a problem - the chair wants to lift up off the ground, but I solved that with a 50 lb. sandbag when there's no passenger (that's sort of a standard routine with these sidecars). The other issue is left-handers: you can't take them too fast, or what can happen is that the rear wheel on the bike will start chattering, and it will want to lift off the ground itself! But, I must say that it was quite thrilling at speed - long sweepers at 85mph were my favourite.

Two other things were good about the sidecar: i) Passengers were much more willing to climb in it than to sit on the back of a two-wheeled bike. I taught a friend of mine how to drive it, and I sat in the sidecar - it was really cool! ii) It was great for long trips - you could stow all your stuff in there, and it kept everything dry, and it kept the sidecar wheel down in right-handers. For me personally, it was particularly great for my Alaska trip - both for the luggage capacity and for the gravel sections of the Alcan, of which there were many at the time.

Getting back to the CB900f, it is a great sport-tourer (did we establish that we're talking about an 'F' model in this thread???). Just get yourself some good soft saddle bags, a back seat bag and magnetic tank bag, and you can cruise all day. I did 1100 miles on mine in 21 hours straight, and the only problem I had was a bit of discomfort across my shoulders. My butt was fine, and because you have that slight lean forward, your spine isn't absorbing the full impact of the road bumps.

Near Skagway, Alaska, at the top of the panhandle.
Image

e3steve
h305 Moderator
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 1:38 pm
Location: Mallorca, Spain & Warsash, UK

Post by e3steve » Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:49 am

Vince, I agree about the Comstar wheels in gold. My 750KZ was met. blue, so I'm not sure the gold would've looked good(?). I didn't like the look of Comstars at all, but seeing yours there......

The 750 had that bloody awful semi-cylindrical CX500 taillight; bleugh! And mine had a Motad 4-into-1 (not my choice). Honda have never bettered the classic look of the CB750K0, IMHO. Oops! Off topic again...
Attachments
....but no comparison to this, for looks!
....but no comparison to this, for looks!
Not mine, which was a ´79 but identical. At least this one is quite pretty.....
Not mine, which was a ´79 but identical. At least this one is quite pretty.....
Last edited by e3steve on Thu Oct 08, 2009 1:23 am, edited 2 times in total.

Post Reply




 

CB-77 | CYP-77 | Road Test | Riding Log | Literature | Zen | Marketplace | VJ Survey | Links | Home