honda305 Home honda305 Auctions honda305 Gallery honda305 Forum


honda305.com Forum

Login
□ Search
□ FAQ 
□ 
Vintage Honda Owners,
Restorers, Riders and
Admirers

engine build - slowly but surely

Post Reply
LOUD MOUSE
honda305.com Member
Posts: 7817
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 8:23 am
Location: KERRVILLE, TEXAS

Post by LOUD MOUSE » Thu Dec 15, 2016 8:27 pm

And the HP at that moment was????????????????? :-) . ......lm

G-Man wrote:Dick

Water is 25% more dense than oil. Even with the long columns I had to be careful not to blip the throttle too hard as it would turn into a water injection kit..... :-)

G
Dick Eastman wrote:
G-Man wrote:Dick

My 4-tube manometer just had all 4 tubes mounted to a single maifold and was mounted on a 4 or 5 foot plank of wood. I used 1/2 inch clear tubing so there was plenty of inertia and the common manifold meant that each reading was pulling against the other three.

Never thought about using oil. The water could be emptied after each use. Preety cheap unless you use Perrier......

G

Perrier? How about some red wine?.......
Never thought about making a manifold. I just wonder how sensitive that much water would be compared to a smaller amount of oil?

Dick Eastman
honda305.com Member
Posts: 273
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 8:27 pm
Location: Troy Ohio

Post by Dick Eastman » Sun Dec 18, 2016 7:38 am

Been wanting to make a torque arm for the brakes, made this Saturday, mainly aesthetics, as it only weighs 1.8 oz less than stock; front will be less involved.. Made from some scrap 6061 alum on hand.
Attachments
engine build 002 (Medium).jpg
engine build 002 (Medium).jpg (54.17 KiB) Viewed 1944 times
engine build 001 (Medium).jpg
engine build 001 (Medium).jpg (66.86 KiB) Viewed 1944 times

User avatar
G-Man
honda305.com Member
Posts: 5678
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:17 pm
Location: Derby, UK
Contact:

Post by G-Man » Sun Dec 18, 2016 12:42 pm

Beautiful!

G
Dick Eastman wrote:Been wanting to make a torque arm for the brakes, made this Saturday, mainly aesthetics, as it only weighs 1.8 oz less than stock; front will be less involved.. Made from some scrap 6061 alum on hand.
'60 C77 '60 C72 '62 C72 Dream '63 CL72
'61 CB72 '64 CB77 '65 CB160
'66 Matchless 350 '67 CL77
'67 S90 '77 CB400F

cknight
honda305.com Member
Posts: 427
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 3:55 pm
Location: Daytona Beach, FL

Post by cknight » Sun Dec 18, 2016 1:01 pm

Well done, as usual. I don't know if you will be using a (relatively) stock centerstand, but if you are, make sure the tab that the return spring attaches to does not interfere with the brake torque arm. Regards, Chase

Dick Eastman
honda305.com Member
Posts: 273
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 8:27 pm
Location: Troy Ohio

Post by Dick Eastman » Sun Dec 18, 2016 2:07 pm

G-Man wrote:Beautiful!

G
Dick Eastman wrote:Been wanting to make a torque arm for the brakes, made this Saturday, mainly aesthetics, as it only weighs 1.8 oz less than stock; front will be less involved.. Made from some scrap 6061 alum on hand.
Thanks.
BTW, I read a post you responded to about a fellow you know who is reproducing stainless steel header pipes, I think in the UK - any insights on this?

Dick Eastman
honda305.com Member
Posts: 273
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 8:27 pm
Location: Troy Ohio

Post by Dick Eastman » Sun Dec 18, 2016 2:11 pm

cknight wrote:Well done, as usual. I don't know if you will be using a (relatively) stock centerstand, but if you are, make sure the tab that the return spring attaches to does not interfere with the brake torque arm. Regards, Chase
Thanks.
Yes I found a nos center stand I am using - thanks for the caution.
BTW, where did you find the carb spacer vacuum fittings you will be using?

cknight
honda305.com Member
Posts: 427
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 3:55 pm
Location: Daytona Beach, FL

Post by cknight » Sun Dec 18, 2016 2:34 pm

Guess I should have added the words "when retracted" at the end of the sentence. The clearance is certainly affected by what you use for an exhaust system aft of the header pipes. You may want to weld on some doublers (1/8" steel material, properly bent) to reinforce the bottom of the kickstand pads where they contact the ground. Lots longer life than provided by the stock material, and the additional height that's provided will help rear tire-to-ground clearance with whatever rear shock length and tire sizes you go with. I'll probably use the MotionPro 5mm vacuum fittings, just a tad larger tap diameter than your 10-32. Thanks, Chase

Post Reply




 

CB-77 | CYP-77 | Road Test | Riding Log | Literature | Zen | Marketplace | VJ Survey | Links | Home